This Post Edited For Profanity
I tried to publish this post, but by the time I was done editing out the profanity it was unintelligible.
I'm sure you know who it was directed at and what it was supposed to say, so I won't bother typing it out.
(All right, so I'm not quite "back")















OH! So, now you are swearing at us, and don't even have the guts to come out and say it to our faces. Fine! Coward!
Posted by: Kiki B. | November 03, 2005 at 12:52 AM
Oh, c'mon! We're all almost adult-like here. What's a profanity or two among foul-mouthed knuckle-draggers?
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel | November 03, 2005 at 04:02 AM
This doesn't sound like a laughing matter, and I'm seriously concerned for you. Are you ok?
Posted by: Cheap Bimbo | November 03, 2005 at 04:51 AM
Thank God I never let things like "too much profanity", "bad grammar" or "poorly formed arguments" stop me.
Posted by: Preston Taylor Holmes | November 03, 2005 at 05:35 AM
We won't mind. Post the the $&#*ing thing.
Posted by: Dodger | November 03, 2005 at 06:21 AM
I assume this is an open thread, therefore not OT.
Libby is going to court today, and apparently will not do a perp walk. More country club treatment for white- collar indictees.
Since the same lawyer who represented Mark Rich is "Scooter" Libby, all you conservatives who were screaming about the injustice of Clinton pardoning the expatriate Rich, will notably be silent as Libby is allowed to keep his passport. A flight risk? You be the judge.
Posted by: Semanticleo | November 03, 2005 at 08:51 AM
Hey, YEA! You're right. How come Clinton didn't do the perp boogie??? Huh?????? I want my PONY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: SondraK | November 03, 2005 at 09:14 AM
Can I have a goddammit!?!
Posted by: Karl Maher | November 03, 2005 at 11:30 AM
SondraK;
Huh?
Posted by: Semanticleo | November 03, 2005 at 02:42 PM
Sementicleo, O Ye of Insensate Testes: Are you so intent on playing sloppy seconds fiddle to Al Gore with your boogie buddy Bill "Blow Me" Clinton? Libby is not accused of anything worse than Marth Stewart; Rich, on the other hand...
Oh, and I'll apologize for the "sloppy seconds" comment tomorrow's press conference, OK? That should be good enough, since it meets the .
Posted by: Jeff H | November 03, 2005 at 05:47 PM
Well, #$$%%^&*.
Let's try this again:
Sementicleo, O Ye of Insensate Testes: Are you so intent on playing "sloppy seconds" fiddle to Al Gore with your boogie buddy Bill "Blow Me" Clinton? Libby is not accused of anything worse than Martha Stewart; Rich, on the other hand...
Oh, and I'll apologize for the "sloppy seconds" comment tomorrow's press conference, OK? That should be good enough, since it meets the John Roberts/CBS standard.
Posted by: Jeff H | November 03, 2005 at 05:52 PM
Shorter JeffH;
AAARRRRGGHH !!
That's more intelligible.
Posted by: Semanticleo | November 03, 2005 at 07:54 PM
But it fails to convey the sense of ineptitude so obvious to the rest of us.
Besides, I'm still waiting for one of my victims to recognize just how thoroughly they've been demeaned by my superior wit. Alas, it appears I must go on waiting...
Posted by: Jeff H | November 03, 2005 at 08:58 PM
Y'know, if I were John, I might just take the whole site down and say screw you all. Good thing I'm not John, because that's probably just what the lot of you want.
White collar indictees you say? unfair treatment you say? PTHTPTHPTHTPH!!!!!!
And while I have the floor, I'd like to answer what Reid, Dean, and the rest of the Demoncrat party is blasting about the Bush Administration and it's "corruption". It's funny, because I don't ever remember the Bush administration receiving campaign contributions from a foreign power. You know who did that? the Clinton/Gore campaign when they received campaign contirbutions from China in '96. And isn't it interesting how our nuclear secrets were then "stolen" by the Chinese at Los Alamos shortly after.
I noticed that George W. Bush was never involved in a shady land deal that resulted in the death of one of his closest colleagues. Oh yeah, and let's see. Who was it from the Bush Administration that tried to steal sentitive documents by shoving them down his pants? Oh right, I forgot.... that was NOBODY!
Corruption. Please!
Posted by: Anti-Dodger | November 03, 2005 at 11:12 PM
Just look over at that pic of Delay on the left, and realize that's directed at you.
Posted by: Anti-Dodger | November 03, 2005 at 11:14 PM
"Insensate Testes" ROFL!! I love it, Jeff. I am filing that away for future use.
Posted by: Kiki B. | November 03, 2005 at 11:18 PM
Dude,
Whatever happened to make you so virulently anti-cleo must have drained you of any wit or originality you might have possessed at one time.
Seriously - some trolls are actually entertaining, but they have to work at it, and they have to use their brains. Cutting and pasting from DU or America Blog is just boring.
Posted by: John from WuzzaDem | November 03, 2005 at 11:26 PM
BfWD - "Seriously..."
I can't believe you used that word. That doesn't sound like the Bob I know.
Anyhoo, M. Rich is still a shifty-eyed p**pyhead.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel | November 04, 2005 at 04:23 AM
I surrender.
The subtle ironic humor at this site overwhelms my meager language skills and leaves me with one option. I must become a republican.
Yet, with all the democratic corruption of the past and the pristine record of the Nixon, Reagan and Bush administrations, I have heard a rumor(which makes it a fact, doesn't it?)
Has anyone heard how Hillary has been cooking Avian flu in her New York basement?
Is she going to release it the next time Condi is in NYC shooting for the Guinness Record for 'most shoes' now held by Imelda Marcos?
Sociopath that she is. Would she really cause the death of thousands of innocents to get just one person?
Would she put her party's political agenda before the safety and security of Americans?
How Loathesome and venal can a person be?
Posted by: Semanticleo | November 04, 2005 at 05:58 AM
Good news my republican brothers !!!
Polls show Bush is at 60%
Posted by: Semanticleo | November 04, 2005 at 06:16 AM
Sorry....my bad.
That's 60% disapproval
Posted by: Semanticleo | November 04, 2005 at 06:18 AM
Semantic,
I thought it was Bill who was doing the cooking now? Hillary's been liberated.
But, seriously, about that avian flu, deaths-of-innocents-to-get-one-person thingy: that's a good question. If the "innocents" had dangling "R"s in their titles, I suspect she'd find them expendable. Wait a minute! That might be the key to her new and improved socialized health care plan. Get everyone deathly ill and those infirmed antagonists will be a) too sick to contest her, and b) begging for her proxied tender mercies. So conniving, so sinister, yet so simple. Drat! GOP foiled again. Mendoooozaaa!
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel | November 04, 2005 at 06:32 AM
With (dis)approval numbers like that, I don't like his chances for reelection. :(
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel | November 04, 2005 at 06:37 AM
You didn't like Nixon's chances for re-election in '76 either.
Posted by: Semanticleo | November 04, 2005 at 07:43 AM
BTW;
Nixon's numbers and Bush II's are fairly comparable at the same point in 2nd term.
I'd call their situations, "peachy".
Posted by: | November 04, 2005 at 07:46 AM
If only we could impeachy elected officials because of bad polling... why, every media source, pundit, or special interest could run a poll every day until it finds one to its liking. It would be great! We wouldn't even need to define the duration of terms since no one would survive one anyway. The exception that proves the rule? Clinton. He was so popular that his fine leadership would have survived any poll.
But none of this is related to Bob's original post about profanity, #$$%%^&*!!
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel | November 04, 2005 at 10:50 AM
Sorry, about the typo. It should read "#$$%%^&*!." and not "#$$%%^&*!!", #$$%%^&*!.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel | November 04, 2005 at 10:54 AM
AD said:"#$$%%^&*!!", #$$%%^&*!.
I have to agree.
Posted by: Dodger | November 04, 2005 at 11:16 AM
Is there a problem?
I thought "peachy" was profanity.
Posted by: | November 04, 2005 at 04:15 PM
"I thought "peachy" was profanity."
Not in Georgia.
Posted by: Jeff H | November 04, 2005 at 05:12 PM