Time for another
installment of "Ask Mr. Stick Figure", where readers ask Mr. Stick
Figure questions so that he can answer them. Which is, umm, why they ask him
questions. You know, so he will answer them. I guess that's kind of self-explanatory.
So I didn't really need to explain it.
Reader "Pile O." asks:
Dear Mr. Stick Figure,
Why do you think the London bombing suspects were willing to be taken alive?
Weren't they suicide bombers? This doesn't make sense to me.
Hel-LO? What doesn't make sense to you? Let's work through this:
What's the opposite of being taken alive? Let's see, could it be.....being
taken dead? Ding-ding-ding-ding! Winner!
Readers "Steve and Robbo" ask:
Mr. Stick Figure,
We watched some of the debate in the House over the proposed CAFTA bill on
C-Span this weekend, and we couldn't help but notice that many Democrats who
talk about 'losing' manufacturing jobs like to say that "These were good
paying jobs." Aren't these same Democrats always saying that people
working in the manufacturing sector are underpaid, and barely able to make ends
meet?
What are you guys, conjoined twins? Watching TV together, writing e-mails together
- spend some time apart, already! As for your question, allow me to point out the obvious:
They're Democrats!
Of course any job they claim has been 'lost' on Bush's watch was a good-paying
job, the same way that a trade agreement from a Republican administration
is bad, even though the same kind of agreement from a Democratic president was
the greatest thing since sliced campaign contributions.
Remember the rules for Democrats: Bush does it - bad. Dem does it - good. Things
Dems would like to do, if only the Republicans would let them - would change
the world as we know it (for the better, of course).
We received this e-mail from "Sue Bob":
Mr. Stick Figure,
I think that "Pile O." was alluding to the fact that the bombing
suspects apprehended in London intended to kill themselves in the failed attacks.
That being the case, one wonders why they would allow the police to take them
alive.
Are you people dense? Did you even read my answer to his question? The police
who captured those scumbags had GUNS. If they shot said guns, those pukes
would be DEAD. Sleeping with the fishes. Taking the dirt nap. El muerte. Comprende? Why are you people having such such a hard time grasping this concept?
Reader "Eric" (or is it "Vince"? We can't figure it
out) writes:
Dear Mr. Stick Figure,
I think what Pile and Sue Bob were trying to point out is that...
ENOUGH with this already! If you people can't understand something this simple,
then you're just hopeless. Next subject.
"Gordon" sent in the following question:
Hey, Mr. Stick Figure,
What do you think of the judge who sentenced the so-called "Millennium
Bomber" to a total of just 22 years, meaning he'll be eligible for parole in
just 14 years?
What do I think? I think that (BLEEP) judge should be (BLEEP) by his (BLEEP)
and have a (BLEEP) (BLEEP) up his (BLEEP) until his (BLEEP) (BLEEP) (BLEEP)
(BLEEP) and his (BLEEP) turns (BLEEP). That's what I think.
Then he should have the same thing done a second time for his ignorant, sanctimonious
lecture from the bench to the Bush administration, in which he makes the ridiculous
assertion that (BLEEP) terrorists who come into this country with the intent
to kill US citizens shouldn't be tried by military tribunals. If this clown
had his way, there's a good chance some (BLEEP) Nazi spy would be living in
my neighborhood after serving his 12 years (with 5 years off for 'good behavior')
and would probably be on some kind of government assistance. Wouldn't that be
nice? What a dick!
WuzzaDem reader "Sobek" sent this in:
Mr. Stick Figure,
Just wanted to inform you that I've completed the bar exam, and I'll find out
in October whether or not I passed.
Oh, thank God! Maybe if we keep cranking people out of law school at this rate, someday
we'll end the crippling shortage of lawyers in this country. And since we seem
to have so many brain donors reading: That was sarcasm! By the way,
Clarence Darrow, you were supposed submit a question. Didn't they
teach you the difference between a question and a statement in
law school? If not, please let me know when you try your first case - it should be very interesting.
Next, reader "Jeffh" asks:
Mr. Stick Figure,
I'm not happy about the sentence that judge handed down either, but are you
sure you should be saying those kinds of things about an officer of the court?
Hey, Einstein, in case you haven't noticed, I'm a stick figure, so there are
certain societal norms that don't apply to me. I can talk smack all day long,
and there's not a damned thing anyone can do about it, so kiss my ass, you pansy!
And, finally, "Mrs. R." says:
Mr. Stick Figure,
While you may be able to say whatever you want without worrying about the consequences,
what about the person who hosts this blog? Didn't he give you a forum to state
your views and opinions? Aren't you worried he might be blamed for any controversy
arising from something you've said?
Hey, John can bite me! Gave me a forum? You must be joking! He practically
begged me to do this! "You gotta help me out, Stick Figure. I'm
out of ideas. I need content." Hey, you needed ideas a long time ago, dude.
People are fed up with the whole "Google" shtick, you know. And, come
on - Andy Griffith?? Talk about desperate!
And John didn't keep his end of the bargain, either. He promised me I'd get
some intelligent questions this time, but you people are dumber than the last
bunch of morons I had to deal with. I'm going out to get sh*t-faced now.