Merry Christmas, New Yorkers!
|


Diplomatic standoff, currently in progress...
![]() I'll tell you my decision on Afghanistan AFTER you tell me what you're planning to do with all the enriched uranium you've been stockpiling. |
![]() Maybe next week. I'm busy. |
![]() Look, I need an answer now. I'm starting to look weak and indecisive on the world stage. |
![]() Yeah?... So? |
![]() Aw, c'mon... |
![]() OK. How about I tell you that there's no way in hell we're exporting our enriched uranium anywhere AFTER you tell me you're not going to send more troops to Afghanistan. |
![]() Man, you drive a hard bargain. |
![]() ... |
![]() Deal. |
But no. Frankenstein science is still the rage.
From Jack Bergman, a behavioral pharmacologist at Harvard Medical School's McLean Hospital in Boston on NASA's plan to irradiate monkeys in hopes of determining the effects of long space flights for humans.
"The beauty of this is that we can assess at different time points after exposure, so not only do we get a sense of rather immediate effects, but then we can look again at longer time points."
Only a vivisector could find beauty in enslaving and torturing innocent, defenseless animals.
We don't belong in space. We belong in caves.
...
Wasn't it the "great" scientist/mathematician/philosopher/vivisector René Descartes who concluded some 400 years ago that animals don't think and therefore are incapable of experiencing pain?
Yes, we've come a long way. Today's men and women of science readily admit that animals feel pain- but they torture them anyway.
Case in point...
|
For Some Parents,
Shouting is the New Spanking
“I've worked with thousands of parents and I can tell you, without question, that screaming is the new spanking..." ... "This is so the issue right now." ... “My name is Francesca Castagnoli and I am a screamer,” began a post on Motherblogger.net earlier this year. “Admitting I’m a mom that screams, shouts and loses it in front her kids feels like I’m revealing a dark family secret.” ... Strategies to stop yelling abound. Ms. Klein said she has a friend who gives herself a timeout by going into another room when she feels a scream coming on. |
How can this be???
Nearly ten years into the new millennium and we still can't find a way to discipline our children without traumatizing them (or ourselves) in the process?
We might as well be living in the Dark Ages. Surely there are more civilized approaches to child rearing.
Of course there are. In fact, I can think of three right off the bat...
Permissive Parenting
You know what's so great about permissive parenting?
Permissive parenting requires a lot less work than traditional parenting, and a lot less work means permissive parents have a lot more time to spend on other stuff.
And let's not forget about all the guilt and blowback that's alleviated by permissive parenting.
For example, you can avoid guilt by not getting all ogre-like with a child when he or she calls you a "c**ksucking douchebag". (You know you're only going to regret it later). You also avoid the subsequent wrath your child will reign upon you for days (possibly weeks) thereafter should you loose your cool in such a situation.
Less guilt and blowback means less stress, and who doesn't want less stress in their lives?
You Wanna Know What's Even Better Than Permissive Parenting?
Letting teachers and school officials decide what's best for kids.
And why shouldn't they? If you discount sleep hours, children probably spend a lot more time at school than they do at home.
So why should parents be the ones making all the tough decisions associated with child rearing?
Talk about stressful and time-consuming!
But You Know What's Even Better Than Letting Teachers and School Officials Decide What's Best for Kids?
Giving parents the option of handing a child over to a government agency the second he or she starts getting on their nerves and/or costing them too much money.
What would be so bad about that?
Besides, everyone knows that being a sperm or egg donor doesn't automatically make one a "parent", so why should sperm/egg donors be expected to act like parents if they don't feel like it?
And where, exactly, is it written that individuals who bring children into this world are required to assume one huge boatload of responsibilities after another, or else(!)?
It's not, that's where.
Therefore, free and affordable government-sponsored child rearing is the constitutional right of all Americans whose sperm/egg donations result in offspring, unwanted or otherwise.
Or it should be...
Because what we're doing now clearly isn't working.
Not that it matters much, since WuzzaDem has stopped blogging, but...
The tool on Twitter calling himself "WuzzaDem" is some tool on Twitter who is NOT WuzzaDem.
UPDATE FROM JOHN:
I'm not "tweeting" (that is what it's called, right? At least I haven't much, or for a long time...whatever), but this is me.
This person is not.
***Exclusive: Must credit WuzzaDem***
Questionnaire
...and I do mean everyone.



Seriously. He looks like he might break something.





























































WuzzaBlog, ain't no more.


































UPDATE: Werd.
UPDATE II: He wanted tea?












Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays from the WuzzaDems!




Indeed.
Um.....yeah, OK. Here's a video clip of an interview with Cooper after the CNN/YouTube Democrat debate back in July of this year:
Yeah, that's the problem - the campaigns manipulating the process.





UPDATE: They really should spruce up the stage with some plants.
Clinton campaign spokesman Mo Elliethee admitted that the campaign had planted the question and said it would not happen again.
...
“However, Senator Clinton did not know which questioners she was calling on during the event. This is not standard policy and will not be repeated again.”








Yes, that's a blogad for Lions for Lambs in the sidebar.
Here's the deal: John Hawkins from Right Wing News was running something called a "Hive Blogad" a few months back, which featured links to various posts from conservative blogs, but there were some technical difficulties, so it was "deferred", which means the order for the ad sits in my little Blogads inbox, waiting to be reactivated. Whenever I log on to Blogads, I see "Conservative Hive Livelink".
This morning I got an e-mail from Blogads telling me a new ad had been submitted, I logged in, and approved the new version of the Hive ad - I thought. When I looked at the blog, these three bozos were staring at me from the sidebar:

AAAAAH!
I logged onto Blogads again, and sure enough, I had mistakenly approved an ad named "Conservative/Lions for Lambs". Apparently Redford and his buddies are looking to convert a few lizard-brained right-wingers with their "powerful anti-war message." Way to budget those advertising dollars, jagoffs.
Well, at least the movie's getting good reviews:
Anyway, thanks for the $36.00, dickheads. I'll use it to pay my TypePad bill. Then we can publish more posts like these.
UPDATE: WTF? They took the ad down. Something I said?
UPDATE II: Hey, do I get to keep the $36.00?
UPDATE III: Looks like I don't get to keep the $36.00